Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing my comments. As for my DISCUSS, I found your more detailed explanation very helpful and believe others reading this document would as well, but perhaps the WG already debated this point and the current text was viewed as being sufficiently clear without being unnecessarily prescriptive. The draft already provides justification for the SHOULD NOT. I will clear my DISCUSS and leave it to you to decide whether or not adding the more detailed justification is helpful. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
