On 04/03/2013 12:27 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 02/04/13 14:39, Phil Mayers wrote: > >> optional!) and what products would people suggest / are people using? >> Bonus points for sensible handling of link-local addresses and subnets >> with >1 router. > > So it's interesting how many of the suggestions are "packet capture" > based, which of course requires access to the subnet layer2. My gut > feeling is that this is unworkable in a lot of enterprise networks - do > people concur?
What do you mean by "packet capture"-based? That the interface must be put nto promiscuous mode? Something else? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: [email protected] || [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
