On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Erik Kline wrote:
Is NAT64/DNS64 without 464xlat really not good enough? For Cameron's mobile phones, where Skype is important, that's a clear need for IPv4. But I suspect that /some/ enterprises might consider "can't run Skype" more of a feature than a bug.
Most enterprise have a lot of legacy applications, so I'd imagine running IPv6 only without being able to do IPv4 literals just won't cut it.
My point is simply that "not good enough" may be more subjective and less objective than I think your statement implies.
When I tried running NAT64/DNS64 on a Win7 machine a year ago, not even MSN messenger worked. Very few applications apart from web browsing worked. I can imagine a lot of software for video conferencing etc won't work properly without being able to access things over IPv4.
I got a private pointer to <http://www.gogo6.com/freenet6/dslite> which might be one way to solve it.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
