Max, > I mentioned Slovenia as we have a request for BGP-enabled tunnel from > Slovenia ;) So for some reasons people still want to use BGP-enabled > tunnels in real life, even in conuntries with well implemented native IPv6. > > The second reason to use 6assist instead of regular TB it is not depend > of the actual load of tunnel server. If somebody download something huge > through a tunnel broker server - the other people just share the tiny > rest of the bandwidth...
if you go down this path, you could rather do BGP tunnelling. as in run BGP sessions between the peers, exchange native IPv6 prefixes, but use a 6to4 next-hop. that achieves the mesh properties you are looking for with an existing mechanism. of course someone will have to advertise a default route somewhere. cheers, Ole
