Hi Sander an d all, As mentioned by Sander all international connections must go through the incumbent telco in Lebanon, and they don't do IPv6 yet and don't seem to be concerned by that. So all the ISPs that do IPv6 have to do it in a restricted manner with tunnels to HE, OCCAID, etc.
I believe that transparency helps. i.e. publishing facts is the least one can do to recognize those who worked hard and facilitated the IPv6 deployment in their environment and expose those who are still hindering and/or blocking such deployment. Best regards, Nabil. ----- Nabil Bukhalid President ISOC Lebanon P.O.Box 113-6596 Hamra, Lebanon M: +961 (0)3 779116 E: [email protected] W . Fb . T -----Original Message----- From: Sander Steffann [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:36 PM To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: [email protected] forum; [email protected] Subject: Re: http://www.6assist.net/ - call for test Hi, >> One of them is Lebanon. All international connections must go through >> the incumbent telco, and they don't/won't do IPv6. Annoying, insane, >> but a fact of life for the ISPs in such countries. So all the ISPs >> that do IPv6 have to do it with tunnels to HE, OCCAID etc. > > So a list with difficult countries and cities and the problematic > carriers, somewhere on a webpage ? And some bigwigs from the > ISOC/IETF/ITU 8-) or so that start to get in touch with the problematic carriers ? > > Or does that sound too easy ? I know in Lebanon it involves political games. I'm not sure that any pressure from the technical community would help there... I'm including Nabil in the CC. He knows :-) Sander
