Hi, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48:37PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:29:43AM +0200, Enno Rey wrote: > > b) (much better): have the router advertise the lower MTU you want to use > > in the RAs by just setting a lower MTU on the (router) interfaces in > > question. > > See also: > > http://blog.ioshints.info/2013/01/mtu-issues-and-tcp-mss-clamping-in.html > > Guys... don't mess arbitrarily with link MTUs (RA) when you have > problems with path MTU.
well, a number of people/organizations I know solve (_other_ parties') path MTU problems by using "conservative" link MTU settings (e.g. 1400) in _their own_ networks... not sure about the intent of the OP though best Enno > > Best regards, > Daniel > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 174 3082474 PGP FP 055F B3F3 FE9D 71DD C0D5 444E C611 033E 3296 1CC1 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de =======================================================
