Hi, > "If we don't compile with CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF (RFC4191 support) a > neighbour is only valid if its nud_state is NUD_VALID. I did not find > any references that we should probe the router on route insertion time > via the other RFCs. So skip this route in that case."
"We didn't find an RFC that tells us to build a working implementation, so we decided not to..." > So I assume that the bug would still be there. Sigh... Thanks for chasing this Pierre, Sander
