On 9/1/13 20:16 , Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Farmer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:I see some value in requiring PTRs for some well-know service, but I don't see value in a general requirement that all IPv6 addresses have a PTR. Which would basically require the use of wildcard PTRs. But in a word where multiple actors shame the same IPv4 address, a PTR is already a wildcard. Should we get rid of PTRs for IPv4 as well then?
No, don't get rid of them, that not what I said. However, I'd be ok with eliminating the general requirement that all IPv4 addresses have a PTR. I'm not sure it is worth the effort of such a change in IPv4, but I would like to see us not continue the bogus requirement in IPv6.
Thanks. -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: [email protected] Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================
