On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:14:52PM +0200, Martin Millnert wrote: > > Anyway, the users will have to pay for that. Too bad users of !AAPL > > have to subsidize those decisions. Time for an AAPL user NAT tax? :) > > Interesting idea. Put AAPL-OUI's IPv4-traffic in lousy-queue in the > BNG? :}
Nah. The problem is that the AFTR doesn't see Ethernet MACs, so you cannot really distinguish AAPL traffic from others. Otherwise you could delay SYNs from AAPL devices by a certain amount. > Or generally, help IPv6 out a little by adding general > IPv4-(latency)-tax? That would punish the innocent majority. Anyway, we had this discussion before: http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2012-June/007060.html Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: [email protected] -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
