Erik, > On 11 August 2014 18:33, Yannis Nikolopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/07/2014 03:05 PM, Ole Troan wrote: > advice with regards to HBH headers. assuming there isn't any feature enabled > that uses HBH. on a platform that supports forwarding of packets with HBH > without punting, forward. for platforms that do punt regardless, drop. > cheers, Ole > > sound advice, cheers :) > > It's there a 3rd case missing?
nah, see above. "assuming there isn't any feature enabled that uses HBH". > If it's a router alert option for use with MLD, process accordingly. if any feature enabled on the box uses HBH for anything, then sure, rate-limit and process. MLD isn't so bad anyway since it is already on the exception path, with a hop limit of 1 and a link-local SA. cheers, Ole
