Jen had presented some similar stats a year ago. https://ripe67.ripe.net/presentations/288-Jen_RIPE67.pdf
-- Tassos Jeroen Massar wrote on 27/8/2014 19:01: > I was doing some traceroutes to determine some weird claim of a transit > (not shown in the below trace) being "tier1" while another transit > actually popped up in their network and then noticed this beauty: > > 9 2001:5a0:a00::2e (2001:5a0:a00::2e) 79.018 ms 79.910 ms 79.960 ms > 10 :: (::) 101.893 ms 102.004 ms 103.574 ms > 11 rar3.chicago-il.us.xo.net (::ffff:65.106.1.155) 104.732 ms > > Yeah baby, we can use the unspecified address in ICMP replies! > > Why oh why is that packet even allowed to come back to me, let alone > travel all those hops... > > Oh, yeah, something with uRPF and other such awesome standards. > > Greets, > Jeroen >
