On 11/03/2014 01:52 AM, Lyle Giese wrote:
If the provider won't or is unable to provide reverse for the IPv6 static address you have, it will be sub-optimal for you to continue to advertise and/or use the IPv6 address for SMTP.

It's all part of the 'prove it's not a dynamic ip address' and part of the 'proper reverse DNS provides some level of authority/delegation to use that ip address for legit SMTP usage'.
My SPF record does exactly that: it provides a level of authority for that particular host to send mail for my domain. In a much better, finer grained delegation, since a PTR maps to a single domain, while a SPF specifies exactly *which* domains permit that particular host to send mail.

The "need a PTR" requirement was created back when SPF was not even a glint in anybody's eye. While I would prefer to have PTR records for all my hosts, I don't agree having no PTR merits a clear rejection of a mail with a valid SPF record for the host.

Reply via email to