On Monday, February 16, 2015, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Anfinsen, Ragnar < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> >What does "IPv4 traffic lowers to...10%" mean here? >> > >> >Is this 10% meant to suggest that you'll wait until 90% of the >> >Internet has IPv6, or when the average dualstack user's traffic mix >> >will reach 90% IPv6 to 10% IPv4? >> >> The latter, apologies for being unclear... :) >> > > Actually, why not wait until 99.99% of the average dualstack user's > traffic mix is IPv6? You seem on track to do that. :-P > This is called a free rider by economist. < deleted Long rant was here , lots of hate> And of course, this is a network, and subject to Metcalf's law, so lack of deployment actively hurts all those who have made the investment in ipv6. Simply: buying ipv4 not only feeds the global "digital divide", it actively hurts those that are trying to make a more inclusive global end-to-end internet. Users dont know or care about ipv4. Great businesses dont make decision on narrow near term shallow business cases. business cases are just one of many tools. <more preachy text removed> Regards, CB
