Hi Lorenzo and list, Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Benedikt Stockebrand > <[email protected]> wrote: > > they should at least send an RS when they wake up and ensure their > configuration is still up to date. > > > That sounds like a bad idea. If devices send an RS every time the user > turns the screen on, and the router responds with a multicast RA, any > medium-size network or larger will have multicast RAs flying around > every 3 seconds and killing everyone's battery. not quite; as Eric pointed out, RAs may be sent unicast. While this was originally intended for underlying NBMA link layers, it does make kind of sense in this context, too. The downside with this however is that it makes monitoring for rogue routers more difficult again (using tools like ramond) at least in switched networks. But aside from that, my wording was imprecise. Make that "send an RS when they wake up and they determine they have been offline long enough", for "long enough" being somewhat in the order of "such that the router lifetime expired" or similar. Figuring out the exact details is left as an excercise to the so inclined reader:-) Cheers, Benedikt -- Benedikt Stockebrand, Stepladder IT Training+Consulting Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/ Business Grade IPv6 --- Consulting, Training, Projects BIVBlog---Benedikt's IT Video Blog: http://www.stepladder-it.com/bivblog/
