Hi,
On 18/05/2016, 14:45, Matthew Ford <[email protected]> wrote: >Many moons ago, europa.eu IPv6 ‘service’ was a reverse-proxy operated by BT. I >have no idea what the current kludge is. I just wanted to briefly follow up in defence of the reverse-proxy as a good design for a HTTP application’s dual stacking model. Just as in the 4-only world a reverse proxy was a valid deployment model to provide load sharing/performance/tcp session offloading from the back end, etc.,etc. My personal website today, whilst of course not a major web asset, utilises a reverse proxy to offer service to suffering people on a legacy 4-only connection. The back end is hosted on a v6 only network, and a reverse proxy is dual stacked. It’s a perfectly OK model. Andy
