An interesting thread from September discussed a bunch of ISP security procedures: http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2016-September/011047.html
I think I'll have to just bridge the AT&T router to get "net neutrality". And I don't want to either but not much available here in St. Louis. Amicalement, Dave -- Maple Park Development Linux Systems Integration http://www.maplepark.com/ If IP addresses weighed one gram each: IPv4 = half the Empire State Building vs. IPv6 = 56 billion earths I use Linux and I wouldn't touch Outlook even if I were using a Hazmat suit and an isolation lab kit. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht < [email protected]> wrote: > > Brandon Ewing <[email protected]> writes: > > I am able to ping6 from my home PC to all remote servers. I am unable to > > ping6 from remote servers to my home PC. From my home gateway's config > > screen I have disabled the packet filter, and from the firewall advanced > > screen, I have ensured that the reflexive ACL is disabled, which SHOULD > > allow inbound packets regardless of state settings. > > Are you sure the ISP isn't blocking all incoming connections with a > second set of hidden filters? I see the same thing on a friend's > Comcast provided modem. Even with the user accessible firewall > disabled incoming ipv6 connections simply never show up on the lan. > Outgoing connections work fine. > > -wolfgang > >
