[ trimmed everything, but ipv6-wg to keep the noise down ] Benedikt Stockebrand wrote:
> Hi folks, > > Jen Linkova <[email protected]> writes: [...} >>There are a lot of topics to discuss on IPv6 WG which do not belong to >>address policy. > > I fully agree with Jen here. So do I, strongly [...] > That said, if I was more involved with the address policy WG, I'd also > expect to get involved if someone proposed to dump some other WG > discussions into "my" mailing list. Also donning my (past) DB-WG hat for a minute, there's always the possibility to include an item like "input from other WGs or TFs" into the WG Meeting's draft agenda. I have done that for years, and it worked quite OK (for the most recent time in London, receiving input from Routing. So, *that*is no reason in my books to talk about dismantling a useful and active WG. No rocket science here, just a tad of looking across the fence :-) [...] > As far as I'm concerned, I do archive the address policy WG, but I don't > generally follow it. And I've got a strong impression that there are > others who actively monitor the IPv6 list but don't even archive the > address policy list. Just fwiw, all of the WGs' mailing lists are archived at the NCC's website >>however from my point of view we've seen enough support to keep IPv6 >>list untouched. I think so. Regards, Wilfried. > So do I. > > \begin{wg-chair-mode} > To deal with this question properly I suggest we follow a two step > approach: > > - First we see *on the IPv6 WG mailing list*---and please set the rcpt > accordingly---if there is some sort of consensus to propose a merger > with the address policy WG list. > > - If that consensus is actually reached, then as the second step the > address policy WG should decide if they actually agree with our (IPv6) > discussions moving there. > > I haven't had time to talk about this with Jen and Dave directly, but as > far as I'm concerned if there is no further discussion on this on the > IPv6 mailing list, I'll consider that as consensus with Jen's statement > and assume the question settled. > \end{wg-chair-mode} > > > Cheers, > > Benedikt >
