* Marc Blanchet > On 14 May 2015, at 11:41, Jan Zorz wrote: > > > Dear IPv6 WG, > > > > As promised during the IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE70, I'm sending the > > link with information how to test remotely different > > implementations of NAT64 that we are running in Go6lab: > > > > http://go6lab.si/current-ipv6-tests/nat64dns64-public-test/ > > > > Ecdysis is the weakest one and somehow a bit buggy, > > why is it? > > FYI, Ecdysis has been integrated into OpenBSD pf and is now part of > the OpenBSD bistro. That version is more stable. So I would suggest > to use an openbsd platform to do testing and get best results > (compared to the linux one).
Or, if there is a desire to run the implementation Linux in the first place, I'd suggest Jool (http://jool.mx), which is actively maintained. BTW all the NAT64 prefixes given on the page are incorrect, at least if the ping6 test targets given are correct the NAT64 prefixes are all /96es, not /64s. Tore
