Hi Yanis,

That sounds surprising, but in any case, a few weeks ago, a new policy proposal 
to facilitate this has been approved. I think is already implemented or it will 
a matter of a few days, so you should not have any problem at all to justify an 
allocation for 1.6 millions of customers or even much more, with a /48.

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ipv6-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Yannis Nikolopoulos 
<[email protected]>
Responder a: <[email protected]>
Fecha: martes, 11 de abril de 2017, 11:24
Para: Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]>
CC: Jan Zorz - Go6 <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Asunto: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for 
comments and suggestions

    On 04/11/2017 11:57 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
    > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
    >
    >> 3.2.2: /48 for all is most practical & most pragmatic? How many /32 we
    >> need to burn for our end users? We have ~1.6M residential users and
    >> our /29 is definitely not enough. Is RIPE onboard with that?
    >
    > Yes. /48 per site is ok as per all IETF and RIPE documents I am aware of.
    >
    > So if your /29 is too small for your customer base, go get another one.
    > I know ISPs who returned their /29 before they even started serious
    > deployment, and received larger space. I encourage people to do just this.
    >
    
    That's great to hear but when we upgraded our /32 to a /29 (~2011), this 
    was not the case unfortunately (meaning that RIPE would not accept our 
    long term addressing plan as a reason enough to get multiple /29s
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the 
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that 
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, including attached files, is prohibited.




Reply via email to