Anno domini 2017 Tim Chown scripsit: Hi,
> But we should not do anything to preclude privacy-enhancing methods being > applied at any layer. > > I would argue that the BCOP text should say: > > a) ISPs are encouraged to support both stable (persistent) and > privacy-oriented (non-persistent) prefixes as options for customers; > > b) stable/persistent prefixes are recommended as the default, in the absence > of legal requirements to the contrary in any specific country. > > I’d also note that the biggest UK IPv6 deployment is a “sticky” /56 to > residences; it’s hard for an ISP to guarantee a lifetime stable prefix, but > they can take steps to minimise the likelihood of a change being needed. +1 Best Max -- "Ja und bei Gnome kann man..." "Ja, aber Gnome ist scheisse!" "Gnome ist kastriert und KDE langsam..." -- Axel Beckert und Lars Dieckow auf dem Linuxwochenende 2009, Wien
