Am 24.05.2018 um 09:18 schrieb Mikael Abrahamsson:
Some comments:
"Editor notes: there are a large number of ipv4-ipv6 transition and
migration strategies: Teredo, 6to4,
etc. "
I'd just like to point out that Teredo and 6to4 aren't migration
strategies, they were basically a way to beta-test the technology.
Please do not mention them, we're way past beta testing of IPv6. Mention
things like 6RD, MAP, NAT64, ds.lite etc. I still see people thinking
6to4 is something that should be deployed today. RFC3068 is already
obsoleted by RFC7526 (a 2015 RFC).
So far so good. But in my humble opinion 6rd plays in the same class as
all other ipv4-based tunnels are doing. Of course isatap and 6rd may
better monitored but they still depending on ipv4.
Please exclude 6rd in your recommendation.
Regards,
Thomas
