On 5/25/18 4:41 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote: > No, the text above, where the names of he organisations are in a footnote, > implies precisely that ITU should *not* develop their own things but instead > cooperate so that what is developed in other SDOs matches whatever needs ITU > believes exists. Without the text, RIPE would never have got the liaison in > the first place.
hi, you clearly say it implies that, ok. i'm just stressing the fact that in this wg it's worthless arguing about ITU's manners as a further argument in favor of the lack of technical quality of the paper. let's stick to the tech issues. thank you -- antonio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
