Agree, however, I will say that such statement should be jointly made by the 
IETF and the RIRs communities (probably via the NRO).

I've copied the NRO Executive-Secretary, in case they aren't following this 
thread, in order to seek their opinion on this.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ipv6-wg <[email protected]> en nombre de Nick Hilliard 
<[email protected]>
Fecha: sábado, 26 de mayo de 2018, 13:51
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
CC: <[email protected]>
Asunto: [ipv6-wg] Y.IPv6RefModel is out of scope for the ITU

    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ipv6-wg wrote on 26/05/2018 12:16:
    > I already said this before, but "... in running such networks vis
    > [via] the RIR policy making fora." is wrong.
    Stepping back a bit, what we're discussing here is not whether address 
    assignment / allocation models should be dealt with by the RIRs or the 
    IETF, but whether they are in scope for the ITU.
    
    The answer to this is that all aspects of IP number resource management 
    are resoundingly out of scope for the ITU.  This includes all IP number 
    resource assignment and allocation issues, all addressing models, and by 
    direct implication, the SG20 work on the Y.IPv6RefModel work item.
    
    There needs to be a crystal clear statement from the RIR community that 
    this entire exercise is wildly out of scope for the ITU, that SG20 needs 
    to cease and desist from reaching into areas outside their competence, 
    and that the Y.IPv6RefModel work item needs to end, immediately and 
    permanently.
    
    Nick
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.





Reply via email to