> On 14 Dec 2018, at 10:58, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> SG20 did not accept the proposals from RIPE NCC, ARIN and the US government
> -- backed by UK, Germany and Canada -- that work on Y.IPv6RefModel should
> stop. But they came very close to doing that. It was a meta-discussion on
> proceduals matters that detailed things, not the content of the "kill
> Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals.
Ugh! That last sentence should have been:
> It was a meta-discussion on procedural matters that derailed things, not the
> content of the "kill Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals.
I'm sure you all realised that anyway.
