Hello Jen Link,

Il 03/10/2019 13:55, Jens Link ha scritto:
Uros Gaber <[email protected]> writes:

1. WHY should it have NAT
NATs are good. They provide security.
Are you sure you are about networking?

2. What do you understand under class, IPv4 "Classes" are just defined
subnet groups (simply put)
Things need names. Numbers are hard to remember. We have Class-A for /8,
Class-B for /16 and Class-C for /24. We need names for the others as
well.
3. AFAIK DHCPv6 is defined in RFC (3319,3646,4704,5007,6221,6355,6939,8415)
But it's DHCPv6. Not DHCP! It works differently. And Android does not
support it. Enterprise Customers want DHCP!
6. Dots and colon, what's the difference?
I have do change my regex.

7. Use DNS to resolve - no [] needed then.
DNS is to hard, to complex and fails to often. And in enterprise
networks it probably done by another team.
[5] what does the script have to do with network layer?
The script was just an example for software breaking when you implement
something that looks completely different like IPv4. I this case the
script is parsing log files and netflow data and we are back to the
regex.

Jens

 __
Riccardo


Reply via email to