Philip Homburg <pch-rip...@u-1.phicoh.com> writes: > NAT64 is also not attractive from a backward compatibility point of view:
At the last meeting Enno talked[1] about plans for a large wireless deployment running v6 only + NAT64 / DNS64. As I know which "Supermarket" Enno is talking about: If this would be deployed in the next 6 month many participants of RIPE 80 would use such a network. Jens [1] https://ripe78.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/117-RIPE78_ERNW_IPv6_Hotspots.pdf -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jensl...@quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
