Hi, On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:33:23PM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote: > [..] > in this light I am wondering two things:
> - Why did the essential netboot related information (filename / server) > never made it into the router advertisements? (I know they exist in > dhcpv6) I think this is related to the main conceptual difference: RAs are periodically multicasted to all nodes on a link, while DHCP(v6) sends tailored information to individual nodes, and only on request. > - Would this be the right platform to discuss an extension to router > advertisements to include a "boot-url" instead of the legacy server + > filename format? It might at least be a place to connect with others interested in working on that, before moving over to the IETF. Wolfgang
