Thanks Carlos for the congrats, and to all of you who supported / voted a very big thank you!
In the v6wg session @ripe80 and later on the list we had a discussion on "why it is so hard to implement v6" initiated by Wilhelm B. I hope we can continue these discussions, and see how to find solutions for these. I dont know what kind of table we need 😎,if at all, but i guess you all know and want that v6 would be the new normal. I cannot speed things up by myself, 😊 but i am convinced this workinggroup has potential. Thanks, Ray Lähetetty Outlook Mobilesta<https://aka.ms/blhgte> ________________________________ From: Carlos Friaças <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:38:50 PM To: Jetten Raymond <[email protected]> Cc: RIPE IPv6-WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day Hi, Is seems you are on the Board now -- Congratulations! -- so perhaps you can try to speed this thing up... :-))))))))) Maybe a round-table, a square-table or something like that with the (other) big guys...? Cheers, Carlos On Fri, 15 May 2020, Jetten Raymond wrote: > But only 2030, not any earlier ? > > We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? ? > > Cheers > Ray > > ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <[email protected]> henkilön Niall O'Reilly > <[email protected]> puolesta > Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44 > Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG > Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day > > On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the > > page have committed to this plan. > > That too! > My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool. > > Niall > > > >
