Hey Eduard,
Vasilenko Eduard <[email protected]> writes: > There is a much bigger problem than the hassle with RIPE formalities and fees. > It is the size of the Internet table. While the size of the global table is a concern, using it as an argument for reducing access to global IPv6 addresses feels wrong to me. For the sake of the routing table, it would be best if only a handful of companies are in the Internet, the best would be very centralised Internet at a single location. >From my perspective, this is the opposite of how the Internet is supposed to work - in a robust and decentralised fashion. Keeping the global routing table manageable is a valid concern, but I don't think it's a good argument for preventing organisations to get their own /48 and connect to the Internet. Aside from that, it is probably not realistic that billions of users are opting in for getting a) their unique address space and b) getting and connected to the global Internet. Best regards, Nico -- Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
