Hi, On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:00:48PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Gert Doering wrote on 03/06/2023 13:33: > > So how do we get there? > > We got where we are now because there are compelling reasons to deploy > ipv4, but not compelling reasons to deploy ipv6.
On "the wild Internet", I agree with you - we're not at the point yet
where you can do fully without IPv4 (even if CGN'ed).
Going back to the Subject: of this thread, inside sufficiently large
Enterprise networks, the hidden costs of IPv4 (multiple layers of inside
NAT44, lack of proper network visibility, much more complex debugging)
are sufficiently high that at least *some* networks already felt
compelled to go IPv6-only, in their internal networks.
(Dual-stack is not very interesting on the inside)
So - how do we send out this message, so it can be heard and understood?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg
