Umm, since folks have decided to perpetuate this thread, I think I'm entitled
to the following disclaimer. Let's see if I can make this sound all legal. :)
My lack of response--in compliance with the chairs' decision to discontinue
this obviously disturbing discussion--shall in no way be construed to imply
agreement. Should the chairs wish to reopen any of the associated topics (or
should anyone wish to consider them in some other forum of comparable scope)
I'd be happy to try to clear up some of the misconceptions surrounding (but
not limited to) how routing works, what NAT does, and who's upgrade analysis
may be more "misleading."
Dan Lanciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
