Process Issue: Not to Fred. > I note the following differences between this document and RFC 2461: > > 1. Two new author names added in upper l.h. corner of P. 1; > date and document I-D name are changed on same page.
I don't think so. This is a 90+ page document. Have Thomas and Erik stated they will not work the updates? We have been told to reduce authors on specs by IETF not add them. Second I suggest not an update to 2461 but a new document highlighting new features and interpretation. More in depth technical response once all is clear of the proposed work and change or if this is even a WG document. We have many precedents to add value to core specs in the IETF without whacking a core spec. This is a core spec the bar will be high to update it and I hope the WG supports that high bar. /jim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
