On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:39:37 +0100, Tim Chown wrote:
> Iljitsch, I agree. This has been discussed a lot on the dnsop list...
> there is currently no consensus about DHCPv6(Lite) vs RA-based discovery.
This keeps popping up and we don't seem to be converging. Just before
reading this thread I contacted some people about trying DHCPv6 on the
MSP IETF network. I have no strong preference (yet) for either DHCPv6
or RA. Let's just give DHCPv6 a try.
What do you think of this idea?
> There seem to be a handful DHCPv6 implementations, but no stripped down
> DHCPv6 Lite implementations yet (the Lite version not maintaining state
> for IP leases etc).
I tried KAME's dhcp6[sc]. It seems to work. Don't you consider this a
stripped down DHCPv6 implementation?
The client code is not very big, setup is easy and it even compiles and
works on my MacOSX iBook.
rvdp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
