On Nov 3, 2003, at 5:12 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
In the case in point, there is a significant constituency who believes that they need a replacement for site local addresses, and that "draft-hinden" is a reasonable way to obtain this replacement. You are indeed free to not use such addresses and never deploy them within the networks that you manage, but that does not change the needs of others.
In principle, I would almost agree with this statement, with one caveat: "... as long as it does not break anything in the global Internet for people that do not use this proposal"
As I explain in a previous message, this last property is not verified by the hinden/haberman draft, as when those addresses leak, they would create untraceable problems, very similar to the one caused by RFC1918 leaks today.
- Alain.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
