Hi, With reference to the roles of the M and O bits in RA messages, Jinmei mentioned that with these bits we should reference the DHCPv6 RFC. I made the statement at Wednesday's session that we may need a reference to the Stateless DHCPv6 document which is not an RFC.
After talking to Ralph, I think that I was wrong about this. The stateless DHCP document specifies how to implement a stateless server which only handles a subset of messages. While these are the same messages required for the O bit, the DHCPv6 base specification supports all these message formats and will provide equivalent service for hosts interested in "Other" information even if stateful address config isn't required. So obviously a reference to RFC3315 is sufficient. Sorry about making unnecessary commotion. Greg -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
