Hi Tim, > > I don't think that the Node Requirements can specify what a > Node MUST do in order > > to perform address config, but it can say what a node > should do when it gets a > > Router Advertisement with the M or O bit set. > > I think the nodes requirement text should simply not change the wording used > in the existing RFCs. So if 2462 says "should" then this text should use > "should" as well. Unless we know 100% we will revise the RFC. This document > is supposed to be a summary, not changing existing > new/conflicting standards.
Agreed. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
