On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:00:46 +0200 "EricLKlein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Chown wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:03:44AM +0200, EricLKlein wrote: > > > > > This may be true, but no one is proposing green cow become an IETF standard. > The list I provided is recently proposed IETF drafts on when and how to use > NAT with IPv6. > I recommend you read some of the drafts you are listing. The "toredo" draft for example. > If there are this many new drafts coming out in November 2003, even with a > WG decision to not do NAT IPv6 then there should be a big red flag that > there is a disconnect between what this WG says and what others are doing. > I would prefer to say it the other way ... if your evidence is actual, it shows the other groups are disconnected with this one. Regards, Mark. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
