Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> ...
> Now, I would be completely happy for us to throw away the Hain/Templin
> draft as long as we immediately standardize the Hinden/Haberman solution.
> But if we want to address (pun intended) the problems of the real world,
> we cannot ignore the fact that most corporate network managers are
> profoundly convinced of the need for private addressing.

In many cases I would agree with Brian, but in this specific one we have an
example of lost discussion from many years ago about why network managers
'need' a private space, and FEC0 was allocated for it. We need to document
why Hinden/Haberman is needed to solve today's problems, so we don't end up
arguing about it 5 years from now.

Tony



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to