One more comment on #8... > > >8) ipv6InterfacePhysicalAddress OBJECT-TYPE > > > > > >If this object is needed (as opposed to just using ifPhysAddress) > > >why does the same reason not apply to IPv4 also? > > > > There was some discussion on this object and the result was a belief > > that it was useful [...]
It would be helpful to implementers to state why this object is needed. I.e., when could it be different from ifPhysAddress? (Is it just if manually configured otherwise?) Also, is it required that the value of this object be in the ifRcvAddressTable? It seems like that ought to be a requirement. -Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
