> Hi Itojun,
> > my proposal:
> > define NI_UDP as replacement of NI_DGRAM. deprecate NI_DGRAM (keep
> > it as an alias to NI_UDP is okay). define NI_SCTP, NI_DCCP and such.
> > these three are mutually exclusive, and if more than one is specified
> > it would cause EAI_FAIL.
> In this case it would be better if getnameinfo returned EAI_BADFLAGS
> rather than EAI_FAIL as it is more indicative of the problem.
ok.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
