> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > my proposal:
> > define NI_UDP as replacement of NI_DGRAM. deprecate NI_DGRAM (keep
> > it as an alias to NI_UDP is okay). define NI_SCTP, NI_DCCP and such.
> > these three are mutually exclusive, and if more than one is specified
> > it would cause EAI_FAIL.
>
> And define NI_TCP, which is also the default if none is specified? I'd also
> propose deprecating the default, to get everyone in the habit of specifying
> something.
deprecating the default would break source-code level backward
compatibility (code written for RFC2553 would have problem) so we
need to keep NI_TCP to 0 and make it a default, unfortunately.
if you have any solution please let me know.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
