Christian Huitema wrote:
Because there is one of those 25 ways that is very tempting and is known to be problematic.Locally assigned global IDs MUST be generated with a pseudo-random algorithm consistent with [RANDOM].
I would have like to see some stronger wording to explain that, in the
self assigned case,
choosing FD00::/48 is a very bad idea.
The draft already says that we MUST assign these numbers exactly one way. Why on earth would we need to enumerate the 25 ways that should not be used?
- Alain.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
