To address rfc2462bis issue 271, "An implementation may want to use
stable storage for autoconfigured addresses", I've added the following
new (sub)section:

================================================================
5.7 Retaining Configured Addresses for Stability

   It is reasoanble that implementations that have stable storage retain
   their addresses and the preferred and valid lifetimes if the
   addresses were acquired using the stateless address
   autoconfiguration. Assuming the lifetimes used are reasonable, this
   technique implies that a temporary outage (less than the preferred
   lifetime) will never result in the node loosing its global address
   even if the node were to reboot. This will particularly be useful in
   "zeroconf" environments where nodes are configuring their addresses
   by the stateless address autoconfiguration but all communication is
   closed in a single link. In such a case, the failure of a "router"
   (that provides the prefix for address configuration) is not
   significant, but loosing the global addresses might be a pain.

   When an implementation tries to reuse a retained address after
   rebooting, it MUST run Duplicate Address Detection for the address
   under the criteria described in Section 5.4, as though the address
   were just configured by stateless address autoconfiguration. The
   reason for this is because a different host may have started using
   the address while the rebooting host cannot respond to Duplicate
   Address Detection from the other host.
================================================================

I tried not to introduce any new requirements that affect existing
implementations (compliant to RFC2462).  But there is still a MUST in
this new section, which may be overkilling for the purpose of this
document.  We could even drop the entire section and leave this stuff
as a future extension.

What do others think?

                                        JINMEI, Tatuya
                                        Communication Platform Lab.
                                        Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to