Hi Jinmei,
> - Thomas made a good point about the rationale of the SHOULD (DAD
> failure for an EUI-64 based address likely indicates MAC address
> duplication). We should also note that John (Loughney) pointed out
> the assumption in 2462 is not necessarily met for the 3GPP case (I
> don't know what exactly he wanted to say, though)
I discussed this with Thomas at the last IETF, and as long as the SHOULD
covers only DAD failures for EUI-64 based addresses, than it covers
my concerns.
thanks,
John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
