assigned issue 37 > From OPS Directorate (Pekka): > > I've reviewed this along the line, and it's pretty good stuff. > > I've sent 3 editorial typos to the author directly. > > One bigger issue, which may not be worth a Discuss, but > something that > IMHO should be discussed in some forum: > > All nodes that need to resolve names SHOULD implement stub- > resolver [RFC-1034] functionality, in RFC 1034 section 5.3.1 with > support for: > > > > - AAAA type Resource Records [RFC-3596]; > - reverse addressing in ip6.arpa using PTR records [RFC-3152]; > - EDNS0 [RFC-2671] to allow for DNS packet sizes larger than 512 > octets. > > .. I'm operationally concerned about the last SHOULD. As far as I > know, EDNS0 is not really implemented. It does not seem to include a > SHOULD to something that hasn't seen practical, wide-spread > deployment > already. I'd recommend removing this or rewording it to a MAY. >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
