> > Hi IPv6ers,
> >
> > You might recall some time ago I stirred up some interest
> > in my Optimistic DAD draft, which seeks to eliminate DAD delay
> > without significantly increasing the risk involved in address
> > collision. In the meantime it's picked up a couple of independant
> > implementations[1] and a couple of conference publications[2].
> >
> > It was debated fairly thoroughly in MobileIP WG,
> > (I presented the idea to the WG in San Francisco[3]) but
> > has since been judged to be outside the scope of that group,
> > as it is applies to any situation needing fast address
> > configuration, not just MobileIP.
> >
> > IPv6 WG seems the proper place for it to be developed
> > further, and I'd like to open it up for debate here with the
> > aim of moving it towards standardization.
> >
> > The latest version is:
> > <draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-04.txt>
> > ... and it's _still_ only 13 pages long.
> >
> > Please let me know what you think ... and if there's enough
> > interest maybe we can discuss it further at Seoul.
i don't think it necessary to raise this discussion again. IIRC it was
not accepted with sane reason.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
