> > Yes, DIID probably (or something similar). I believe that simplest
> > solution is that a specific ID value can be allowed only for single
> > node on the link. Any use of same ID part with any prefix by another
> > node should be viewed as an address collision.
>
> I can see where you are coming from: for DAD to safely
> interoperate with DIID it must send even more messages: wouldn't
> it be nice to just send a single NS/NA pair? After all,
> DIID is already compatible with DIID.
this i remember very precisely. we have already discussed DIID/DAD to
death and picked DAD already. i don't think it necessary to open the
topic up again.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
