>Dear ADs, consider this mail as my second step in the appeal chain.
>
>Specifically, the part I object to are:
>
>- under the FD00::/8 prefix (Locally assigned):
> using the 'all zero' pattern instead of random bits would have the
>exact same effect
> as using the 'site local' address: it would create ambiguous
>addresses. The ipv6
> wg spend over a year deprecating 'site local' addresses for that
>reason. It is the duty
> of this wg to document that using that particular pattern can be
>harmful.
>
>-under the FC00::/8 prefix (Centrally assigned:)
> the document says that:
>" The requirements for centrally assigned global ID allocations are:
> - Available to anyone in an unbiased manner.
> - Permanent with no periodic fees.
> - Allocation on a permanent basis, without any need for renewal
> and without any procedure for de-allocation."
i support Alain 100%.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
