>>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 02:33:23 -0500,
>>>>> Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> In the wg meeting on Tuesday, several concerns were raised regarding
>> this issue (and the proposed resolution). To summarize (some of)
>> them,
>>
>> 1. the resolution proposes to say "the stateful protocol is DHCPv6"
>> clearly, without leaving other possibilities. This would require
>> RFC3315 (DHCPv6) to be listed as a normative reference. However,
>> we'll then face a reference dependency issue, since rfc2462bis is
>> soon expected to be recycled as a DS while RFC3315 is still a PS.
>> (BTW: I could not find a direct source of this dependency issue.
>> Could someone give me a pointer?)
> Do you mean that a DS spec cannot have an informative reference to a PS spec?
No, my understanding is:
- a DS spec cannot have a normative reference to a PS spec. (though I
could not find a direct source of this dependency rule)
- a DS spec can have an informative reference to a PS spec.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
