>>>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:53:07 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Regarding issue 277 of rfc2462bis (Semantics of M/O flags), one
> controversial issue is how clearly we should specify the stateful
> address configuration protocol.
(forgot to mention this) in this message, I intentionally concentrated
on the stateful *address* configuration protocol. We'll also need a
similar discussion about the stateful protocol for *other*
configurations. However, things are much clearer for address
configuration and it would help to limit the discussion scope for not
making it unncessarily diverse.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
